- This topic has 97 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I’m not sure about all this ‘realism’ talk. What i’d prefer is a game thats fun, introduces something new and can be played as a team and is bug free. Now its not difficult to pick out which one of those points doesn’t fit bf2/bf2142 (still waiting on 2142) But BF2 can, when we have a good server full, meet all the other requirments
To be honest i think realism can seriously get in the way of the fun side. Is it ‘real’ for a soldier to hide in a position for a long period of time, well yes probably in the right circumstances. Is it fun? Well personally speaking, no, it bores the hell out of me.
In the week i played RO I was out walking through a shopping centre. I walked past a window, one which i’d never noticed before and thought ‘hey, thats a comfy looking pair of brown cord slppers’ Thankfully a firm breasted young woman then wlaked past reminding me that i’m not quite yet a pipe smoking geriatric.
BF2 is still by far the most advanced multiplayer game yet made, and while its also the most buggy, things, as they say, can only get better ๐
Ohh theres a surprise… Max agreeing!
lol
now then.. TBH fluff.. playing RO for a week *esspecially in a FREE week and saying its crap is truley something graham norton would do.. you cannot have an opinion on this game in just a week.. it takes time and patience..
As for BF2 being fun.. I can honestly say I had more fun and laughs with 1942/BFV.. those were fun times.. BF2 is ok but bringing stats into the game truley spoilt the fun.. too many people play for badges.. some go on deliberatly for that reason alone!
Only those that prefer the arcade feel to a game which makes it easier to play will indeed like BF2.. RO is something different and DOES use teamwork, only difference being is that theres no Easy squad procedure that you have in BF2.. no map showing where your team mates are, you have to talk ingame and let people know whats going on, thats what makes it more fun and intense to play ๐
totally different yet satisfyingly gameplay
I remember Max saying in TS.. it would be a top game if you had a mini map.. says it all really ๐
lol
@=XDC=iNSANE wrote:
now then.. TBH fluff.. playing RO for a week *esspecially in a FREE week and saying its crap is truley something graham norton would do.. you cannot have an opinion on this game in just a week.. it takes time and patience..
It took me less than a week to realise that stabbing myself in the hand with a fork was not very fun… it was free too!
(not the fork mind- think ot cost รฦรโรยขรขโยฌร ยกรฦรขโฌลกรโรยฃ3.99 as a part of the kitchen range of Ikea – not a bad price for so much cutlery…)
@=XDC=iNSANE wrote:
I remember Max saying in TS.. it would be a top game if you had a mini map.. says it all really ๐
lol
pmsl
we all gotta agree to disagree…..some like the more realistic style of play others like arcade style….nuff said
@nOm wrote:
we all gotta agree to disagree…..some like the more realistic style of play others like arcade style..
Whoa, calm down there nOm. No need to get so goddamn psycho.
๐ฏ
now then.. TBH fluff.. playing RO for a week *esspecially in a FREE week and saying its crap is truley something graham norton would do.. you cannot have an opinion on this game in just a week.. it takes time and patience..
Re-read my post and at no time did i say it was crap….thats a word you came up with all on your own
And seriously m8 how can you say giving a whole week to testing a game isn’t enough!!! lol I’m fairly sure I can make my mind up about something well within a week. I actually played the game trying to like it but nothing felt right for me.
I guess going off an RO rating I’ll stick with arcade fun over realistic boredom anyday ๐
As NOM said each to their own
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.