Home › Forums › XDC Gaming › Gaming – general › ‘Brain Games’
- This topic has 13 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by VicJameson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 22, 2007 at 12:22 am #16174XDCJuDgE-MenTaLParticipant
heard it all before…many times
Aussies develop brain-driven game
It sounds like something straight from the pages of science fiction.
A woman puts on a sensor-studded helmet and, using her brain alone, is able to play a video game, performing actions including opening doors and picking up objects.
But not only is the technology now available, two Australians are at the forefront of bringing it to the world.
Unveiled at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco last week, technology company Emotiv’s “brain computer interface” reportedly allows users a new generation gaming experience.
The interface helmet, developed by former Young Australian of the Year and Emotiv president Tan Le and her partner Nam Do, also picks up facial expressions and emotions of users and displays them on screen. The gaming system is one of a range of brain-operated devices that will become available this year, including computers and wheelchairs.
The gaming helmet has received more than $1.5 million in funding from the Federal Government under an innovation development scheme.
“The next major wave of technology innovation will change the way humans interact with computers,” Mr Do said.
“We are incorporating computer-based activities not only into the way we work, learn and communicate, but also into the way we relax, socialise and entertain ourselves.
“The next step is to enhance these experiences by making the way we interact with computers more lifelike.”
The system has received excited reviews from technology journalists, who have seen a prototype in action at the show.
Emotiv said its system worked by detecting electrical activity generated by brain cells, known as neurons, using a process known as electroencephalography. Similar technology is used in hospitals to detect epilepsy and sleep disorders in patients.
The company’s interface captures and wirelessly transmits information about brain activity to a processor, allowing interaction with video games.
The more a person uses the technology, the more adept the system becomes at recognising the person’s intentions and emotions.
US reports suggested children took to the system more quickly than adults who were less able to engage in fantasy.
When users play a game using the Emotiv interface, 15 sensors detect their brain activity.
After a series of training sessions most people are able to move objects in a virtual world through force of will. The sensors also pick up on facial expressions such as smiles, grimaces and winks, portraying them on the face of the player’s avatar – their on-screen representation.
The sensors are also said to be able to detect emotions such as fear and excitement.
Meanwhile, a German company has unveiled an interface to allow users to compose messages on their personal computers and play simple games using only their brains.
The Guger Technologies device works along similar lines to the Emotiv system, monitoring brain activity.
Also under development is a thought-controlled robotic wheelchair that would allow paralysed people to move freely through their environments.
Nah for some reason I cannot get excited about this at all. Probably because
a) it’ll be crap
b) it’ll be crap
c) it’ll be crapgood news for Stephen Hawkins though, with his brain he can now achieve his dream of being an F1 driver. !
March 22, 2007 at 10:20 am #49210sickofitallParticipantSounds good in theory but could lead to some terribly awkward moments in online PC games when your avatar mimes your thought process, “I’m bored shitless of this Battlefield 5124 lark, think I’ll go on the internet and have a massive wank instead.”
Probably safer with a mouse and keyboard.
March 22, 2007 at 10:44 am #49211XDCNeonSamuraiParticipantSOIA, I’m a little disappointed in you. Clearly this ‘mind games’ tomfoolery is nothing more than a hoax, or a scam to increase some dodgy computer company’s share options.
How do I know this? Well just try reading the first part of the article again:
A woman puts on a sensor-studded helmet and, using her brain alone, is able to play a video game, performing actions including opening doors and picking up objects.
A woman? Using her brain? I thought back in the 1940’s scientists proved beyond reasonable doubt that women only use their minds to think about knitting, kittens, how her husband is always right and knitting little hats for kittens. That’s all.
The research and article is therefore a sham!
March 22, 2007 at 10:46 am #49212xdc magickerParticipanti remember something like this when we were kids – it worked in theory but it was bugger all use for anything and you need to train the system to work with you…. just like voice recognition and how many people did not get past the 1st paragraph of that training thing that came with dragon and other voice recog proggies?
March 22, 2007 at 12:01 pm #49213TurksMeisterParticipant@sickofitall wrote:
Sounds good in theory but could lead to some terribly awkward moments in online PC games when your avatar mimes your thought process, “I’m bored shitless of this Battlefield 5124 lark, think I’ll go on the internet and have a massive wank instead.”
Probably safer with a mouse and keyboard.
BTW mate, that MMOG where you could buy a penis and suck off a horse is called second life!
March 22, 2007 at 12:36 pm #49214XDC wild egg tamerParticipantJudge was beginning to regret working in R+D
March 22, 2007 at 8:45 pm #49215XDCJuDgE-MenTaLParticipant@sickofitall wrote:
Sounds good in theory but could lead to some terribly awkward moments in online PC games when your avatar mimes your thought process, “I’m bored shitless of this Battlefield 5124 lark, think I’ll go on the internet and have a massive wank instead.”
Probably safer with a mouse and keyboard.
yea, especially when they try and realise a patch to fix the ‘furious wank bug”.
March 22, 2007 at 10:43 pm #49216hampsterParticipant@TurksMeister wrote:
@sickofitall wrote:
Sounds good in theory but could lead to some terribly awkward moments in online PC games when your avatar mimes your thought process, “I’m bored shitless of this Battlefield 5124 lark, think I’ll go on the internet and have a massive wank instead.”
Probably safer with a mouse and keyboard.
BTW mate, that MMOG where you could buy a penis and suck off a horse is called second life!
Did you know you could get banned for shooting a room full of furries doing it like on the discovery channel?
The bloody bullets didnt even hurt them.
March 22, 2007 at 11:17 pm #49217XDCJuDgE-MenTaLParticipantLOL eggy
u KNUT
March 23, 2007 at 12:01 am #49218LensmanParticipant@=XDC=JuDgE-MenTaL wrote:
yea, especially when they try and realise a patch to fix the ‘furious wank bug”.
Bug??? Sounds like a “feature” to me….leave it in.. 😛
March 23, 2007 at 12:16 am #49219XDCJuDgE-MenTaLParticipantagreed, but they always remove those ‘features’.
[csgeek] I used to love being able to move the hostages as a terrorist in Counterstrike but they ruined that, although on Militia you could push them against a particular wall and they would float irretrievably to the top of the map
Also liked being able to jump off a roof onto someones head and periodically shoot them with a pistol without them realising where I was, just run around with them and watch them spin around looking everywhere but up, much to the amusement of the spectators….again ruined..sigh[/csgeek]sorry don’t know what happened there…..my mind wandered…”one time my mind wandered all the way to venus and ordered a meal I couldn’t pay for”
where were we..ah yes SOIA’s wanks …
March 23, 2007 at 1:30 am #49220TurksMeisterParticipant@hampster wrote:
@TurksMeister wrote:
@sickofitall wrote:
Sounds good in theory but could lead to some terribly awkward moments in online PC games when your avatar mimes your thought process, “I’m bored shitless of this Battlefield 5124 lark, think I’ll go on the internet and have a massive wank instead.”
Probably safer with a mouse and keyboard.
BTW mate, that MMOG where you could buy a penis and suck off a horse is called second life!
Did you know you could get banned for shooting a room full of furries doing it like on the discovery channel?
The bloody bullets didnt even hurt them.
Did you play it/do that?
Sounds very odd!
March 23, 2007 at 5:10 pm #49221hampsterParticipantApparently it is ok to bugger Men,Animals and small children in Second Life. But spray a minigun into a furry orgy and you are some sort of Nazi who deserveth a banhammer.
No weapons are allowed to be used in a safe zone. The bloody thing did crap all, pushed 1 guy 3 feet.
March 24, 2007 at 1:56 am #49222VicJamesonParticipantYou can bugger animals????
*runs off to sign up*
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.