I’ve gone and done something rather rash

Home Forums XDC Private forums XDC Chat! I’ve gone and done something rather rash

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 62 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #77811
    TurksMeister
    Participant

    Come on! You cannot compare it to the price of a PS3 when it came out, as much as I cannot compare the cost of a PS3 to a PC when they first came out!

    I am willing to bet that the graphics on the first ever PS3 were significantly better than on the first PC.

    Yes – you are right… it is an unfair comparrison… I am going to rest my briefcase here!

    #77812
    XDCiNSANE
    Participant

    To me, the video I posted has better GFX than most of the PC games I’ve seen, just watch the Facial expressions in Noir.. ok 5 years old hardware… but to produce those after all that time on alledged “Old” hardware, well fuck me rigid, money well spent if tehy can bring that to the table without me going out and buying a new GFX card etc.. The fact neither Msoft or Sony have decided to stick with these for longer and not bring out new hardware says it all.. whereas they bring new gfx and cpu out every year which “moths to lights” have to buy because its new and they want there games to run even better, whereas the games on a console run out of the box no issue

    No issue I tells you, ok I bought an Nvdia 470 recently (£220).. I tried a demo of MOH.. I installed it and the drivers and went to play.. I put GFX to full.. I start to play and yeah it looks exactly the same as it does on Xbox.. however when I’m starting to play the game, when I move mouse to look around, I get glitchy shit, well to be honest, its more like a ummm.. how do I explain, basically it reminds me of window blinds by means of sections when you look left, but it kinda takes time to catch up, its so obvious when playing which fucks me off to be honest… Why is this?

    #77813
    crazy hippo
    Participant

    @=XDC=iNSANE wrote:

    To me, the video I posted has better GFX than most of the PC games I’ve seen, just watch the Facial expressions in Noir.. ok 5 years old hardware… but to produce those after all that time on alledged “Old” hardware, well fuck me rigid, money well spent if tehy can bring that to the table without me going out and buying a new GFX card etc.. The fact neither Msoft or Sony have decided to stick with these for longer and not bring out new hardware says it all.. whereas they bring new gfx and cpu out every year which “moths to lights” have to buy because its new and they want there games to run even better, whereas the games on a console run out of the box no issue

    No issue I tells you, ok I bought an Nvdia 470 recently (£220).. I tried a demo of MOH.. I installed it and the drivers and went to play.. I put GFX to full.. I start to play and yeah it looks exactly the same as it does on Xbox.. however when I’m starting to play the game, when I move mouse to look around, I get glitchy shit, well to be honest, its more like a ummm.. how do I explain, basically it reminds me of window blinds by means of sections when you look left, but it kinda takes time to catch up, its so obvious when playing which fucks me off to be honest… Why is this?

    the reason for this is that unfortunately very few developers make PC games only any more. as a result when the development process for a multiplatform game is started they have to work from a common base of graphical capabilities. this is usually the PS3 as its the weakest in terms of memory capabilities and therefore the graphics cannot be as detailed. then once they have the common graphics/artwork setup devs will begin to uprate the graphics for the other platforms.

    when it comes to multiplatform development the PC version is always done last. the reason is very simple, if you have a release date to which you are working to both PS3 and 360 version have to be sumitted to Sony and Microsoft respectively, they take 20 days to check the game according to their standards and will only allow it to be published once it has passed this certification. PCs do not need this process, so as a result the PC version will be concentrated on during those last 20 odd days while the other versions are with first party.

    by doing it this way all of your SKUs go to manufacturing at about the same time, and you can hit your street date.

    like it or not this is the case with every multiplatform developer. i dont like it but the fact is that unless you are the likes of blizzard, valve etc and can make 95% scoring PC games you will not make as much money as you would if the game was on all platforms. business is business and thats all the matters to these guys. the other major factor of not doing PC only games is that piracy pisses off developers and publishers no end and as they gnerally make sod all money on pc versions there is no incentive to make them, but that is a whole different discussion.

    there are a whole host of problems associated with multiplatform development which i wont go into as i suspect people will fall of their chairs bored out of their minds 🙂 i dont like multiplatform development regardless of the game genre. it waters down the development process, great games stand out on any platform by the little things that make you go “sweet” when you see them. most of these little things tend to be missed during multiplatform development.

    so to go back to the original discussion, it doesnt matter what platform is your favourite just keep enjoing games…. but dont tell me consoles are better cos they just plain aint!!!!! 🙂

    #77814
    Alzir
    Keymaster

    Well to get back to the original post regarding the upgrade itself, I’m sure you’ll all be thrilled to hear how it has all turned out 🙂

    I got the gfx card delivered next day, and immediately installed it so I could measure for myself the level of improvement I was getting for the rash investment. Running some games and benchmarks it became very obvious that the bottleneck in my setup was the CPU, as I was only getting a marginal improvement with the 460 GTX over the ATI 4850HD. Benchmarks showed an improvement of under 1000 3d mark06 points, bringing me up to around 7000 total. TF2 showed some improvement as I was able to whack everything up full and run the game at around 50 fps average, it would spike as high as 100fps on occassion but likewise drop to 35-40 when the going got tough, however it looked good. Interestingly BC2 also improved to a reasonably playable level, but it still looked shit. These less than impressive results clearly explain why page 3 models are not falling all over me.

    So anyway, last night I had the joy of installing a new motherboard for the first time, and despite it being slightly more complex that I first thought it went pretty smoothly. There were some connections on it I had not previously noticed, such as fans and the power and reset switches, and the LEDs etc, but once I noticed they were all quite clearly labelled it was pretty straight forward. The motherboard I got in the cheap CPU bundle offer was also a lot smaller than my old board (as I thought both were ATX, or at least that ATX meant one standard size), and with the GFX card being larger than I expected I had some difficulty squeezing SATA cables and my soundcard in together, but I got it sorted. I’m limited to using 2 SATA connections, when I wanted to use 3, but you’ve got to expect some drawbacks when you’re buying something so cheap, and the main thing is that it won’t impact performance.

    Now a tip for anyone who also feels like going down this route, make sure you have as many possible network drivers downloaded for your new motherboard’s onboard lan controller as you can, before dismantling your old setup, or at least make sure network drivers are on the driver CD provided with it. I downloaded one set of drivers but I was a bit careless with this as I assumed it was on CD, and this lead to problems later, since once you’re offline it’s difficult to fix driver problems. To be honest the problems were of my own making, because I was also careless when running the installation CD, and misread the setup program as having installed everything it could. When I retraced my steps later in the night I discovered this was where I’d gone wrong, and rerunning the setup sorted all the problems.

    All the above problems can be put down to a complete lack of experience doing something like this, and whilst I admit I held my breath and half expected sparks to fly while I pushed the on button for the first time, overall I’d recommend this approach as a cheap PC option. That someone who’s experience in building PCs is limited to installing single components, can do this without an instruction manual, shows how easy it is. I wouldn’t recommend this for someone who simply knows how to send an email with a computer, like my mother, but for anyone here wondering whether they could do it as well, I believe you could. There are plenty of voices here who could help with any questions you have too, and I can certainly offer my advice now as well.

    Regarding how the PC is performing, it’s amazing. TF2 is regularly hitting 200+fps, and I haven’t seen it drop below 100 yet. I’m going to have to cap the frame rate manually now so I don’t get frame lag 😯 BC2 is also amazing, and runs perfectly at high settings. I don’t know the command to check framerate in BC2, but suffice to say it’s good. I only have an issue to sort now with my ISP because of the shitty pings I’m getting, and I’ll be back online properly 🙂 Hopefully it’ll start raining page 3 models at that stage too.

    #77815
    xdc the doc
    Participant

    Pfft banging PC hardware together is not in the slightest bit difficult.

    Almost all PC issues are related to drivers and software in my experience…. and very frustrating they are too.

    Consoles are shit… but when i think of all the time over the years I have spent troubleshooting my PC’s over the years…. GRRRRR!

    #77816
    TurksMeister
    Participant

    @xdc the doc wrote:

    Pfft banging PC hardware together is not in the slightest bit difficult.

    Almost all PC issues are related to drivers and software in my experience…. and very frustrating they are too.

    Consoles are shit… but when i think of all the time over the years I have spent troubleshooting my PC’s over the years…. GRRRRR!

    Can you expand on why Consoles are shit?

    #77817
    bmstalker
    Participant

    @=XDC=iNSANE wrote:

    There is a smaller technology gap between the PS2 and the PS3 than there is between the latest PCs and the PS3

    Wipes the Floor

    I beg to Differ..

    http://www.gametrailers.com/video/penetrate-the-deus-ex/707555

    XBOX 360 footage I think you will find

    Another example and not a PC in sight –

    http://www.gametrailers.com/video/sleuth-slideshow-l-a-noire/707569

    http://www.gametrailers.com/video/sleuth-slideshow-l-a-noire/707569

    Got me PC up and running for a short while as I’m in between windows versions. Took the time to watch those vids. The graphics can only be described as shit. I mean really? Those are the vids you think will convince people that the graphics on a console are great?

    Dug around for this:

    http://www.gametrailers.com/video/high-temple-3dmark-11/706472

    and another one:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWNtwq8Fvyw

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F6zSgtRnkE

    These tech demos, will easily be run with full graphical detail on todays mid ranged cards such as the one in the OP.

    If you can’t see the difference between this and the xbox graphics, then consoles probably are best for you. 🙂

    PCs are clearly superior.

    #77818
    Alzir
    Keymaster

    The future of console gaming, and soon to be present day PC standard.

    I meant to post earlier in the week about those videos you posted as well Mike, as I was really confused. My old rig could have run that first game, and as exciting as the gameplay was made to look in the trailer, the graphics honestly looked dated. The second two videos were just stills, and I’ve no idea what argument clinching point they were trying to convey.

    #77819
    XDCiNSANE
    Participant

    That console GFX are as good as over priced PC graphics, simple as really

    F’in tech demos? show me a proper game and one that you can run on a £100 GFX card that looks as good

    Dreamers

    #77820
    Alzir
    Keymaster

    ffs you just won’t back down will you 😛 It’s almost as if you think you have a point.

    The game below appears to be a rip off of L4D on first impressions, but holy fuck this looks atmospheric, and much better than that video you posted (which looks like it’s 2 or 3 years old) and miles better than the stills you posted. Posted link so you can watch the HD version as well.

    GTX 460 will run this no bother – cost 100 quid

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg_RcB91x2o

    [youtube:1d26mgxs]Eg_RcB91x2o[/youtube:1d26mgxs]

    Something you could probably use as a direct comparison between your xbox and a PC, below is a framerate test for bad company 2, showing the game in dx9, dx10, and dx11. You’ll notice a significant difference between the image quality in dx9 (console level) and dx11.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLqgcetMRK8 (for selecting HD version)

    [youtube:1d26mgxs]KLqgcetMRK8[/youtube:1d26mgxs]

    Of course dx11 is relatively new, but will soon become the standard. Consoles will catch up with this eventually, while PC’s continue to act as pathfinders for them.

    #77821
    XDCiNSANE
    Participant

    Ok time to knock this on the head, I know fanboys dont like change, but it happens, Consoles are popular, even the developers of games acknowledge this due to the amount of money they can make on them, if this wasnt the case, I’m sure Santa’s list would be full of PC requests, but it isnt, Fact, its too costly and for most without a technical brain, too much hassle.

    Gaming is for fun which is why consoles attract people, PC’s as popular as they are to some will never be as popular to all like they once were

    Gameplay over GFX, example although I know you wont agree because “it didnt look good” but RO for gameplay was one of the best FPS games I’ve ever played to date

    And I do have a point, for those that dont want very pwetty GFX but can get enough without spending a small fortune, and I know you keep mentioning £100 for a card, but last time I looked you couldnt stick a GFX card in a shoe box on its own to be able to play games

    Metro, played both PC and Console, and thinks its a shit game, nothing new there that Stalker didnt do, infact I’d say they ripped that off.. and that video albeit I’ve only watched teh first few mins is way too dark, I can make FIFA11 look atmospheric by turning the contrast/brightness down on my TV/Monitor, all I seen gameplay wise was someone frantically swipping a knife around (I think, too dark to tell) at fuck all whilst being shot at, wheres the fun in that? FEAR for atmospheres (On PC) is far better and looking forward to FEAR 3 (On PC) fyi

    And to BFBC2, Frostbite engine first seen on 360 I believe in BFBC1, how can you use that as a direct comparison? The specs alone for that would cost over a grand easy which proves nothing on a versus basis

    I remember when console gamers used to slag XBOX over PS3, now its PC verses Console all of a sudden, wonder why that is, Dont hate the change, embrace it and get out of the past 😀

    #77822
    Alzir
    Keymaster

    Hang on, why are you making the Metro example about gameplay? You asked for a dx11 video of gameplay and dark or not, you can clearly see superior image quality. And just look at the BC2 comparison, it doesn’t matter what platform it was developed for, you can see dx11 is better.

    And I do have a point, for those that dont want very pwetty GFX but can get enough without spending a small fortune, and I know you keep mentioning £100 for a card, but last time I looked you couldnt stick a GFX card in a shoe box on its own to be able to play games

    and

    The specs alone for that would cost over a grand easy which proves nothing on a versus basis

    Atm I’ve only had a chance to play BC2 in dx10 because I’m limited to win XP, but I can now play this at full detail, with all bells and whistles turned up as far as they’ll go. Tomorrow I’ll have win 7, and I don’t expect to have to adjust my settings down for dx11. I refer you back to the op for how much this cost. You can add a tenner to that for win 7.

    Gaming is for fun which is why consoles attract people, PC’s as popular as they are to some will never be as popular to all like they once were

    Gaming is fun on both platforms, and while arguments regarding their relative popularity can’t be properly discussed without some figures, I have only noticed the trend you mention amongst a handful of people in XDC. One thing which struck me during my competitive TF2 adventure earlier in the year, for example, was how young everyone was, and to me this suggests PC gaming is still in a very healthy state.

    Anyway, I digress. Consoles are the cheaper option for the masses, there’s no point really discussing that, but for the guys here for whom cost is a concern, this post proves there’s a cheaper way to upgrade your PC. The hardest part of this is pulling your motherboard out of your case, which requires the ability to use a screwdriver and note the shape of some connectors. Not exactly taxing, but it can be scarey notion if you don’t realise how easy it actually is. The cost of building this is within the budget range of your average console gamer, and easily less than the cost of next generation consoles on release (judging from the price of the XBOX 360 and PS3). When you take the price of games into consideration, we’ve already discussed how quickly any saving evaporates in taking a budget/lightweight console.

    So in summary, the cost argument shouldn’t be an issue for anyone here, I’ve just proven how cheaply it can be done, and if I can do it, I dare say even Turks could do it.

    #77823
    bmstalker
    Participant

    @Alzir wrote:

    The cost of building this is within the budget range of your average console gamer, and easily less than the cost of next generation consoles on release (judging from the price of the XBOX 360 and PS3). When you take the price of games into consideration, we’ve already discussed how quickly any saving evaporates in taking a budget/lightweight console.

    So in summary, the cost argument shouldn’t be an issue for anyone here, I’ve just proven how cheaply it can be done, and if I can do it, I dare say even Turks could do it.

    This,

    Simply put, the prices are comparable, the graphical cababilities, range and volume of games, the fact you can actually control yourself in FPS games with actual accuracy makes PCs a far supperior choice.

    PCs are clearly supperior.

    Also, snow=awesome=day of work.

    #77824
    TurksMeister
    Participant

    Please spec me a fully working PC which I can buy new for less than £279, which will play all these games in DX 11.

    I am using this top range PS3 as comparrison. I am sure I can find one cheaper, but think you need as much help as possible.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-PlayStation-Slim-Console-Model/dp/B00422MS8E/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1291020392&sr=8-1

    Extra points if you can get a Blu Ray Player in there.

    Many thanks in advance

    #77825
    TurksMeister
    Participant

    Turks – Winnnzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 62 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.