Graphics quality question

Home Forums XDC Gaming Battlefield 2142 Graphics quality question

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #15880
    Lensman
    Participant

    I’ve just upgraded my graphics card from a 5900XT to a 6800GT, and as a result have been able to update my quality and image size settings quite a bit.

    Originally I had most effects etc turned down low, and ran at 800×600. This gave me a very playable framerate on the 5900XT.

    However, now I can run with everything on medium/high and at 1024×768, and am pretty stunned by the quality difference. Some of the levels look completely different with dynamic lighting, shadows etc all turned on, and it almost feels like I’m playing a different game.

    So now I’m thinking that if I turn all the effects down again (just keeping the higher res), I’ll get fantastic framerate at the expense of graphical gorgeousness.

    So, what’s your choice?

    #44828
    Wipers
    Participant

    I kinda like seeing the game as the developer intended so am willing to sacrifice a bit of fps for the graphical gorgeousness.

    #44829
    XDC MadHippy
    Participant

    @Wipers wrote:

    I kinda like seeing the game as the developer intended so am willing to sacrifice a bit of fps for the graphical gorgeousness.

    Me too! 😉

    #44830
    XDC Dutchman
    Participant

    Graphical beauty is the way to go. OR at least then I can say my FPS is crap and that’s why I play crap

    #44831
    Ryzo
    Participant

    Best of both, hovis.

    #44832
    XDCNeonSamurai
    Participant

    I’ve got an old 6600 card, which’ll let me play 2142 on ‘medium’ settings at 1024×768 with AA on. The game still looks ‘pretty’, but it has a lot of trouble on the titan maps. So much that I often can’t fight onboard a titan due to the frame rate dropping to something like 10 or 12.

    Roll on a nice ‘new’ 1950XT (when I’ve got some money).

    #44833
    Alzir
    Keymaster

    Definately framerate over beauty. I’m fortunate enough these days (for the first time ever) to run games at top gfx settings and still have a decent framerate, but even though games do look wonderful, the moment I find my framerate suffering the settings will be adjusted down. I’d rather see a few ugly kills, than alot of gorgeous deaths.

    #44834
    TurksMeister
    Participant

    Ive got in to buying external things for my computer, as I am bored of upgrading all the time. So therfore – frame rate over beaurty… as I am beautiful enough already!

    #44835
    crazy hippo
    Participant

    @Alzir wrote:

    Definately framerate over beauty. I’m fortunate enough these days (for the first time ever) to run games at top gfx settings and still have a decent framerate, but even though games do look wonderful, the moment I find my framerate suffering the settings will be adjusted down. I’d rather see a few ugly kills, than alot of gorgeous deaths.

    agreed, performance over graphics. a higher frame rate will improve a multiplayer gaming experience far more than graphcs.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.