Home › Forums › XDC Public forums › General › natures way at Kruger….
- This topic has 23 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 5 months ago by
XDCiNSANE.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 23, 2007 at 8:40 am #16487
XDC wild egg tamer
ParticipantTheres some annoying “aussie” guy that keeps chatting but i’m sure pharty will translate 😉
May 23, 2007 at 8:58 am #51894XDCMcQueen
ParticipantAwsome….Buffalo rulez
May 23, 2007 at 9:33 am #51895TurksMeister
ParticipantGripping stuff
May 23, 2007 at 10:13 am #51896tess
ParticipantAwwww poor l’il baba, I bet it died anyway, they were chewing away at it for ages.
May 23, 2007 at 12:11 pm #51897XDCiNSANE
Participantyou seen that int news of the zoo in china that feeds live cows to a pack of hungry tigers.. £100 a cow.. £2.60 for a chicken!
old news it seems after finding link via google..
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1266775,00.html
theres vids on youtube if your ghey and want to watch
May 23, 2007 at 1:06 pm #51898tess
ParticipantOh God, I want to watch but I know it’ll make me sick! I’m trying to get the courage to click on the link:D
May 23, 2007 at 1:08 pm #51899Ryzo
ParticipantWTF?! Theres a bear in a dress
May 23, 2007 at 1:19 pm #51900tess
ParticipantOk, I watched, and the first bit wasn’t too horrific. The performing animals and the mad ones were tragic, I would love to be able to do something about their plight, they are very obviously unhappy.
Although it may seem offensive, if these tigers are to be returned to the wild, they need to be encouraged to behave as wild animals. Captive breeding programs are all very well intentioned, but there are very few animals in zoos which would be capable of survival in the wild. Animals ideally suited for zoos do not, on the whole, have characteristics which will benefit them or the offspring in the wild – zoos, regardless of what they claim, do domesticate animals. At least these boyos would be able to feed themselves. And they seem much happier than the tigers I have encountered in safari parks and zoos.
May 23, 2007 at 1:20 pm #51901tess
Participant@Ryzo wrote:
WTF?! Theres a bear in a dress
How gay, you like the bear in a dress? 😆 I haven’t been to that sort of a club in ages. Weeks anyway…
May 23, 2007 at 1:23 pm #51902Ryzo
ParticipantNothing quite like a bear in a dress, they just do it for me
May 23, 2007 at 1:25 pm #51903tess
ParticipantAnd, while you’re here, your sig annoys me mightily!
Who is the king baby?
Or are you missing a comma, should it be “Hail to the king, baby”?
Let me know as I am revising and so this is obviously of the utmost importance, causing me unbelievable distraction 😛
May 23, 2007 at 1:31 pm #51904Ryzo
ParticipantIt was intended to have a comma, but the king baby that you brought to me attention sounds better. So ill keep it.
Hope that solves your dilemma.
May 23, 2007 at 1:34 pm #51905tess
ParticipantWell, it is resolved partly.
But now I need to know – who is this king baby to whom you refer??? Is it the Little Baby Jesus??
May 23, 2007 at 1:44 pm #51906XDCiNSANE
ParticipantTotally agree .. IF there making it back into the wild that is.. the fact they are doing it for entertainment must cast a doubt on the mind
If they did it behind closed doors fair enough.. obviously this would aid them to be released.. but for an audience its a bit wrong
May 23, 2007 at 1:49 pm #51907VicJameson
ParticipantFuck ’em, they’re only cows.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
