Home › Forums › XDC Public forums › Technical Support and Digital Media › Which is the best 939 chip for overclocking?
- This topic has 9 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 5 months ago by nOm.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 16, 2006 at 8:38 am #13973XDCNeonSamuraiParticipant
It’s getting to that time of year again where I start thinking about upgrading my system. Nothing too extravagant, but in this case I’m thinking about moving from socket A to 939.
Which of the AMD 939 chips is best for overclocking? I’m looking to spend around £110 (inc VAT) for the OEM CPU, and want something that I can speed up a bit without too much hassle.May 16, 2006 at 8:52 am #24201XDCMcQueenParticipantThere pritty much all as good for overclocking,But u will only beable to do it via the FSB as the multiplier is locked on all AMD cpu`s apart from the FX series but u will pay alot more money for them.
From what ive been reading the Optron cpus overclock alot more than the Athlon and X2 chips.
Shame you didnt say a week ago m8 as i sold my FX55 (1 month old ) for 200 quid 🙁
May 16, 2006 at 9:05 am #24202XDCNeonSamuraiParticipantThanks McQueen, I’ve been looking at the new Opteron chips. I’m not too worried about cranking a 2.0 Ghz chip up to 3.0 Ghz, but I like to make my money go as far as I can. 😉
As for the FX55 you sold, well I probably wouldn’t have been able to buy it then. Too much money going out and not enough coming in 😉
But let me know if you if anything that might be suitable comes in.
May 16, 2006 at 9:14 am #24203sebgrosParticipantfrom what I ve read if you are really into o/c, then you got more MHz to gain from a 3200+ than a 4000+ cause the potential gain of power is bigger… but it s must be easier to make a “small o/c” of a bigger cpu…
me points at 3700+ and 4000+ cause they got 1Mb cache rather than 512 on a lot of other chips…
on the other hand the 3800 dual core is @ a good price for dual core and can be o/ced to sthg really cool like a 4400 or more…
then it depends what MB you want and the chipset on it…..
May 16, 2006 at 9:29 am #24204xdc magickerParticipanti have a 4400 x2 and had a quick play with whaking the fsb to 250 mhz and it still booted!!!
was quite amazed
but at present quiet fans are the call of the moment
May 16, 2006 at 2:24 pm #24205SuicideParticipanthttp://tomshardware.co.uk/2006/05/10/dual_41_ghz_cores_uk/index.html
4.1gig duel core for £80 – apparantly
May 16, 2006 at 2:40 pm #24206XDCNeonSamuraiParticipant@Suicide wrote:
http://tomshardware.co.uk/2006/05/10/dual_41_ghz_cores_uk/index.html
4.1gig duel core for £80 – apparantly
I was reading that t’other day. Pretty impressive, although I don’t see that Intel will let folks get away with doing that for too long. I was wondering if I should change my alliegiance back to Intel in this one instance…
June 4, 2006 at 1:32 am #24207nOmParticipantgot me 2gig 3200 up to 2.5 stable, can get 2.7 but slightly unstable 😉
running memory on a divder, but no performance loss (crap memory aswell), an extra .025 volts was needed mind.25% overclock 😀 most 3200 should do quite well
to be honest for less than £100 there good value, but bear in mind that intel are releasing their Conroe chip, which is ment to something special.
June 4, 2006 at 8:43 am #24208LammieParticipantYes I know a guy who works on the Chip Design for Intel. He says that the entry model Conroe with give you a 20-40% increase over the AMD FX-62 due for release soon. Core entry model prices are expected to be around the $200 mark.
Here some links to some reviews
http://www.hothardware.com/viewartic…leid=794&cid=1
June 4, 2006 at 9:52 am #24209nOmParticipantonly thing is you can bet your arse that uk will pay premium prices 😕
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.