Deicist

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 117 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: So Titans…. #35477
    Deicist
    Participant

    Yeah, that’s my view too… I got voted off as commander last night though for moving the Titan forward. Noobs.

    in reply to: Okay, where are you hiding? #35472
    Deicist
    Participant

    Ah, cheers fella

    in reply to: 2142 Feedback Thread #35244
    Deicist
    Participant

    @=XDC=NeonSamurai wrote:

    Curse you Wipers you tease!

    Although is it worth getting the demo to work, or just bite the bullet and buy the game?

    get this:

    http://www.softwarepatch.com/windows/directx.html

    in reply to: Battlestar Galactica series 3 #35409
    Deicist
    Participant

    I’m not hugely impressed with the start of this series tbh. Series 1 was fantastic, series 2 started well and ended well but was a bit flat in the middle… hopefully this series will pick up but at the moment it’s not really doing a lot for me.

    in reply to: New bits #33712
    Deicist
    Participant

    Hmm, I’d have gone for a conroe myself… the Athlon 64 X2s are good processors and will run anything you want with no trouble, but the intel conroes are better and cheaper.

    in reply to: RIP Steve Irwin #33383
    Deicist
    Participant

    “involvment into Irwin death” doesn’t make sense, should be ‘involvement in Irwin death’

    in reply to: Torrent client… #27819
    Deicist
    Participant

    I used to use Azureus but for some reason it maxed out my CPU whenever it was running…. poor Java implementation I think. I now use Bitcomet:

    http://www.bitcomet.com/

    but only because it supports uPNP, which means you never have to worry about opening ports or anything as long as your router supports uPNP as well.

    I also use http://www.torrentspy.com for my searching.

    in reply to: 2142 Review (by me, von, whats played it ‘an I) #33032
    Deicist
    Participant

    @Erratic-Space wrote:

    Quality post mate I want it even more now!

    Do we know the release date for sure yet?

    Later than it’s supposed to be but before it’s actual finished and debugged I would expect.

    in reply to: Joining? #32722
    Deicist
    Participant

    @ajnabi121 wrote:

    @=XDC=iNSANE wrote:

    If she looks anything like the girl in my Avatar.. she can borrow my Vass anytime ๐Ÿ˜€

    LOL She is a HE โ— โ— โ— LOL

    Insane never mentioned whether Bloodshape was male or female, his ‘if she looks like…’ comment was in response to Zigzags comment that ‘Insane doesn’t normally let anyone else use his vasoline’. ‘Anyone’ is gender neutral so Insanes response was meant to imply that anyone could use his vaseline, as long as they were a) female and b) fit.

    Don’t they teach reading comprehension at school anymore?

    Also, welcome Bloodshape ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: C&C3 #32698
    Deicist
    Participant

    @VicJameson wrote:

    It’ll have to go a long way to beat Supreme Commander in spunkability.

    Still, the C&C series has been Exactly the same game recycled over and over again with updated graphics since red alert 2 so anything is possible ๐Ÿ™‚

    fixed that for you ๐Ÿ˜‰

    I hate C&C with a passion. It’s the EA sports of RTS games, bung out the same game, with the same features but better graphics every couple of years and watch the punters lap it up. Meanwhile games which are showing some innovation in the genre (Total annihilation, Homeworld) sell about 3 copies. Pah. The annoying thing is C&C3 will probably outsell supreme commander by about 3 to 1.

    in reply to: Hard Drive Size #32356
    Deicist
    Participant

    Install service pack 2. XP up to service pack 1 can only see drives up to around 130GB.

    in reply to: SNAKES!!!!!!!! #32181
    Deicist
    Participant

    Who cares about Snakes on a plane. I’m not on the plane, I’m in the plane. Those little buggers can sit on the wings and freeze to death all they want, doesn’t bother me ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Up Shit Creek? #31776
    Deicist
    Participant

    http://www.etymonline.com/baloney.php

    The word shit has a long and well-documented history, far older than any large-scale organized sea-trade in northern Europe. Anglo-Saxon leechdom books use scittan in reference to cattle having diarrhea. A Latin text from 1118 refers to “Lues animalium, quรƒฦ’ร†โ€™รƒโ€ รขโ‚ฌโ„ขรƒฦ’รขโ‚ฌลกรƒโ€šร‚ยฆ Anglice Scitta vocatur, Latine autem fluxus interaneorum dici potest.”

    The acronym theory of the origin of shit can’t explain the related words in other languages, such as German Scheiss, Dutch schijt, Old Norse skita, and Lithuanian sikti, which come from the same prehistoric root. As far as I know, there’s no corresponding acronym to “ship high in transit” in the merchant marine history of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

    So, the acronym theory for the origin of “shit” breaks down because:

    * the word itself is a good 1,000 years older than the common use of acronyms;
    * the original form of the word (Anglo-Saxon sc-, which regularly evolved into M.E. sh-) does not correspond to the supposed acronym;
    * the verb is the original form, the noun derives from it; the acronym supposes the noun came first;
    * no one has produced a single instance of this supposed acronym from any old mercantile record or ship’s manifest;
    * in fact, no one has ever established that there was a custom of shipping manure;
    * the word has cognates in many other languages, including ones outside Germanic, for which no acronym theory of origin makes sense;

    It doesn’t fit the facts, it requires a very elaborate supposition for which there is not the slightest evidence, and there is a much simpler, saner explanation for the word, the only drawback of which is that it doesn’t make a very good Internet joke.

    Say it with me: “shit is not an acronym.” Repeat 100 times for every time you forwarded that e-mail. Now go forth and sin no more.

    edit: Also the Posh=”Port out, starboard home” thing is a lie too, before you start ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: new signature #31784
    Deicist
    Participant

    Should say ‘ if you’re hard enough’ as in ‘if you are hard enough’ rather than ‘if your hard enough’ which would mean something like ‘if the hard enough, which belongs to you’ which just doesn’t make sense.

    in reply to: Section_8… a figure of controversy #31749
    Deicist
    Participant

    Whoa, wait, there’s a wake island map for BF2?

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 117 total)