Home › Forums › XDC Public forums › General › Man nicked by own Utube video
- This topic has 184 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 9 months ago by TurksMeister.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2007 at 6:59 pm #45938XDCOldPhartParticipant
@=XDC=sPUNKer wrote:
PMSL ๐
February 20, 2007 at 7:29 pm #45939XDCsPUNKerParticipantJeebus LeGiT you dont know when to quit!
irrespective of you being l33t and in control far more people are aware of a motorist approaching at 30mph than the extremely short period of time they would be aware of someone doing 60+ its obvious, its not rocket science its just plain common sense!
I really couldnt be arsed to get involved in this thread as it needs to go to the arguement clinic but lets face it:
or
could I make it any clearer?by the way this young chap (Eddie Kidd remember?) I bet he was in control and Im sure he is still in control of this lovely wheelchair ๐
Time to back down from this one methinks and time for Wolf to lower his blood pressure also ๐
February 20, 2007 at 7:38 pm #45940XDCiNSANEParticipantWell said Mr S.. I couldnt write down what I thought without using the words, Cock, thick c*nt and bellend so I left it alone
February 20, 2007 at 8:29 pm #45941AnonymousParticipant@=XDC=sPUNKer wrote:
Jeebus LeGiT you dont know when to quit!
irrespective of you being l33t and in control far more people are aware of a motorist approaching at 30mph than the extremely short period of time they would be aware of someone doing 60+ its obvious, its not rocket science its just plain common sense!I really couldnt be arsed to get involved in this thread as it needs to go to the arguement clinic but lets face it:Time to back down from this one methinks and time for Wolf to lower his blood pressure also ๐
Ain’t nothing over ’till it’s over and there is still nothing concrete saying it is dangerous by NOT hitting people, so untill that time no retreat, no surrender ๐ฟ You would in theory think most motorists would be more aware of a vehicle coming at them slower rather than faster, but the reality is they don’t even look to see what’s coming in the first place. There could be a guy in the street handing out free money and many of them wouldn’t even notice…. ffs they barely notice the emergency services; only a handfull of people bother pulling over untill the fuckers are practically shunting them out of the way…..
Seriously – is it so hard for people to say why speed kills directly instead of dancing around the issue? By y’all standards I should have comiitted genocide by now if it was even remotely true? People would have been dying up and down the country simply because I was going fast and not ramming them? LOL
February 20, 2007 at 9:03 pm #45942XDCiNSANEParticipantSo wheres you concrete evidence that going faster avoids other peoples deaths?
you aint got any.. all you have done is blamed motorists for you being a cock and unable to ride a bike
Its a proven fact that you hit a kid at 30mph he has a chance of living.. hit him any faster and they’ll be dead.. hit em at the speeds you think you can go and fuck me I’d hate to see what they look like after that.. if theres owt left
A true rider would laugh at the bollocks you have come out with in this here forum post
February 20, 2007 at 9:29 pm #45943AnonymousParticipant@=XDC=iNSANE wrote:
So wheres you concrete evidence that going faster avoids other peoples deaths?
Well.. ain’t no one dead yet and ain’t crashed or had near misses at anything other than 30mph…
@=XDC=iNSANE wrote:
you aint got any.. all you have done is blamed motorists for you being a cock and unable to ride a bike
Rofl.. I can ride it and ride it well too… and FYI the other crashes have been proven to be the other partie’s fault, soreally I don’t see where you are going with this. I was only a cock after the first crash and not before, yet shit still happens.
@=XDC=iNSANE wrote:
Its a proven fact that you hit a kid at 30mph he has a chance of living.. hit him any faster and they’ll be dead.. hit em at the speeds you think you can go and fuck me I’d hate to see what they look like after that.. if theres owt left
Maybe you’re not reading but I’ve even said that myself in several of the posts, but how is it dangerous by NOT hitting them?
@=XDC=iNSANE wrote:
A true rider would laugh at the bollocks you have come out with in this here forum post
Get them in here then – anyone who has even ridden like a cock has done so and will do so again, they may not agree with all points but they will see eye to eye on many.
February 20, 2007 at 10:15 pm #45944XDCsPUNKerParticipantWhat is it with you LeGIt? your making yourself look more and more like a prick every time you respond with what you think is right and everyone else seems to understand is wrong. You aint going to convert anyone to your way of thinking unless they want to openly admit to being nominies for the Darwin awards like yourself. Why dont you find a local race track and take your “kick” out on there instead of thinking you are untouchable. We only have your word to go by on the accidents that you have had and you HAVE had a few since we’ve known you so be a good boy and STFU
the hole you are digging is deep enough as it isFebruary 20, 2007 at 10:28 pm #45945AnonymousParticipantBecause what people understand as wrong is wrong. I’m not trying to convert people to my way of thinking, but they should atleast be open to it and understand it before they reject it. It seems more like people are slating it because they feel they’re supposed to without actually considering, or admitting the possibility that some of my shit makes sense. There are race tracks, but onless you have about รฦรโรยขรขโยฌร ยกรฦรขโฌลกรโรยฃ20k for 1 season alone, with that being minus van and mechanics and tryes, then it ain’t happening. Track days are a waste of time because the insurance is so expensive and taking the revs into the red will only bitch slap your engine. Of course I’ve had crashes, but if it would really make fuck all difference I could just as easily post the reports. I’m not digging a hole, y’all digging it for me.
Is it really so hard to belive speed is not the danger, but the absence of awareness and/or control is? Speed just acts as the multiplier in the event shit goes wrong, but there is no danger when everything goes right….
Speed = no problem
Lack of awareness = crash
Lack of control = crash
Lack of awareness/control + speed = bigger crash.February 20, 2007 at 10:33 pm #45946LensmanParticipantMore speed = less reaction time. Both yours and theirs.
It’s not rocket science.
If you are bitching about the lack of awareness of others, then by going at stupid speeds you are giving them less time to react to you.
February 20, 2007 at 10:53 pm #45947AnonymousParticipantNot really – more speed = same reaction time but by the time you react you have covered a larger distance. You have to look real far ahead, right into the distance, so you can plot what is happening and plan for what will happen before you get there. Most people really don’t need to react in any shape or form to be overtaken so in a lot of cases it’s not really a problem….
February 20, 2007 at 11:23 pm #45948wheelsParticipant@=XDC=iNSANE wrote:
A true rider would laugh at the bollocks you have come out with in this here forum post
๐ ๐ ๐
* Real biker enters *
LeGIt, please tell me your a young, new rider??…coz you obviously got no idea about riding and if you carry on, you wont live for much longer!
I,ve read most of what you,ve been saying and was going to reply individually to different things you,ve come out with, but TBH i cant be bothered! ๐
Im 45 and bikes have been in my blood since i was taken on the back of a bike when i was 6. I bought my first bike when i was 12, and pasted my text within 3 months of turning 17. I,ve had far too many bikes to list them all, but i,ll just add i,ve had a Kwak 900 streetfighter, Suzuki 1200 Bandit, FJ 1200, CBR1000f and most recently a Kwak ZX9R and a baby ZXR400, so i think my age and the bikes i,ve had means that im an experianced biker and i should know what im talking about!
Im not going to say i,ve never broken the speed limit, coz i would be lieing if i did, but there is a time and a place, and its not in a 30 mph speed limit!
I dont know you from Adam, and i dont want to fall out with anyone just yet…..but most of what you,ve come out with is a load of bollocks….just what you would expect from a Fazer rider! ๐ ๐
February 20, 2007 at 11:30 pm #45949XDCsPUNKerParticipantyou are not alone on the roads LeGiT. your reaction times may be l33t in your eyes but you are an infinitessimal factor in the shape of things.
take a simple case of reaction awareness if you will: A car is about to pull out of a junction in a 30mph zone. he looks left and see’s a motorbike quite a way off and proceeds to pull out but that bike that appeared a way off when he took a quick look is now screeching into the side of his car at speed. Now is that his fault for making an assumption that a 30mph speed limit means the oncoming vehicle shouldnt have got to him when he pulled out? as presumably what that bike should have been doing when he made that quick calculation was 30mph or would you have anticipated that move also LeGiT and by then have been riding on the pavement at 60 to avoid him or perhaps into the wrong lane whatever does that make the motorcyclists actions right? please tell me as I’m having great difficulty coming to terms with your fucked up logic.
By the Way LeGiT drugs are a big rush and can give you the opportunity to kill yourself if you so wish without taking unneccesary victims and you can also pretend that you are in control with them tooAs for digging holes for you I think most of us currently wouldnt mind helping you make that hole deeper. Perhaps Australia? ๐
answer this one if you like then Please PLEASE PLEASE STFU!February 20, 2007 at 11:40 pm #45950AnonymousParticipant@wheels wrote:
[Im not going to say i,ve never broken the speed limit, coz i would be lieing if i did, but there is a time and a place, and its not in a 30 mph speed limit!
I am young (ish) but not new ๐ Used to ride off road before all the sites either got closed down for redevelopment or old farts started moaning. Once I fell off a monkey bike and had Honda burned onto my leg ๐ But rode Yamaha TY80, Suzuki TS80, Kawasaki (whatever 125), Suzuki RM250 and Kawasaki Z440 (and those are the ones I can remember) before I was even in my teens. In my teens used to ride various friends bikes, usually over the moors.
Maybe I’m a bit backwards but after my crashes I find it easier, safer and more comfortable doing it in urban areas and in the nice country roads I tend to go the speed limit (as slow as the road allows) – before my crashes it was the normal way around ๐ …. but then bouncing off a car with your face amongst other things would screw anyone up a bit ๐ But in any case, if you don’t do over 30 in a 30 zone, then maybe it’s a bit hard for you to accurately comment?
I’m a KTM Duke II rider now though, the back end doesn’t want to do anything else but go sidweways -_- Supermotard FTW!! I can’t really go too fast on this bike even if I wanted to, 110mph top speed and it takes forever to get there, I mostly ride it 40-60 depending on mood and conditions. I miss not having 4 cyclinders to whack on the power, but in the meantime my single is enough fun untill I build my zer0 cyclinder ๐
But still, it’s not all bollocks ๐
EDIT: And spunker returns :O
That has happened many times but never collided. Check the mirrors. cover the brakes, ease off the throttle a bit and align slightly away from them -_- If they didn’t pull out there is no problem and if they do you’re ready to deal with it. It has happened a few times @ 30mph though… when the guys decide to pull out into the side of me as I’m going past…. They look left then pull out right =/
My logic isn’t fucked up, it’s perfectly fine, though a bit literal…
February 20, 2007 at 11:49 pm #45951XDCsPUNKerParticipantFebruary 21, 2007 at 11:08 am #45952LensmanParticipantEpilogue
@LeGIt wrote:
Not really – more speed = same reaction time but by the time you react you have covered a larger distance…..
Jesus – it’s like arguing with a fucking amoeba. Car pulls out 50 yards in front of you and you have half the time time to react doing 60 not 30. Actually less, when you factor in the different stopping distances.
Oh, why bother…….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.